The sudden death of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk has sparked renewed energy among conservative circles, as elected officials and right-wing organizations work quickly to build on his legacy and expand their reach. Yet the larger question for America—and particularly for Black America—is not simply how the right will grow, but whether there will emerge countervailing platforms rooted not in reactionary politics but in sustained civic engagement, education, and leadership development.
Too often, our national politics have been framed as a battle between two wings of the same broken bird. One side drapes itself in the language of progressivism, the other in conservatism. Both wings claim to represent the people, but neither has effectively addressed the specific needs of the African-American community. Black interests, once central to national conversations during the Civil Rights Movement, are too often relegated to footnotes within broader party agendas (Morris, 1984).
Historically, we had organizations that defined their missions around our community’s needs. The NAACP (founded in 1909) established the legal groundwork for desegregation and civil rights victories. C.O.R.E. (Congress of Racial Equality), the SCLC (Southern Christian Leadership Conference), and SNCC (Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee) organized mass protests and voter registration drives across the South. The Black Panther Party created community-based survival programs such as free breakfast initiatives. Malcolm X’s Organization of Afro-American Unity (OAAU), though cut short by his assassination, sought to globalize the Black struggle, while the National Action Network (NAN) continues to push for civil rights accountability today. And the Nation of Islam (NOI), under the leadership of the Honorable Elijah Muhammad, gave birth to many of the political philosophies and do-for-self principles that still resonate in Black organizational life. JET Magazine in 1976 named Elijah Muhammad the most influential Black social reformer of the century (Johnson Publishing, 1976). As Minister Louis Farrakhan often reminds his audiences with wisdom drawn from that legacy: “You can take it, or leave it alone.”
These organizations not only protested injustice but built schools, provided food programs, and shaped young leaders. They taught discipline, vision, and purpose. Today, we must ask: where are their successors? Where are the institutions that combine civic education with community service, political advocacy with cultural pride, and activism with decorum?
A platform is needed that is not reactionary to the right, nor co-opted by the left, but instead firmly grounded in the daily realities of Black life. Such a platform would sharpen civic literacy, promote respectful dialogue, and tackle specific-issue concerns that rarely find space on mainstream agendas—whether housing inequities, health disparities, student debt, or community violence.
This approach should not be viewed as insular. In truth, every successful movement in America—from labor unions to women’s rights to LGBTQ advocacy—has drawn strength and strategies from the Civil Rights struggles of Black people (Branch, 1988). Yet too often, as others advanced, the specific needs of African-Americans were lost in the grand “melting pot.” It is not selfish, then, to tend first to our own house. By doing so, we strengthen the foundation upon which all others can stand.
Black America has a unique opportunity. We can choose not to be pawns on the chessboard of left and right, but architects of a new civic model. From these organizational efforts, we can cultivate a new generation of leaders who are not satisfied with merely being invited to sit at the table. Instead, they will design the table, build the house around it, and ground it firmly on the foundation laid by freedom fighters.
If the current political climate teaches us anything, it is that comfort is dangerous. We must organize, innovate, and build new rungs on the ladder of progress. We need courageous, fearless, and intelligent leaders who understand that struggle is the soil from which progress grows. Our response must not be reactionary. It must be visionary—rooted in history but focused on the future.
